When a story crosses a line.

01What a useful report contains

The service is operated by frwrd.team LLC, doing business as dks.studio. Identify the story and its revision, scene, branch or audio timestamp; explain the concern; and give a reply contact. A short relevant excerpt can help. Do not send unnecessary personal data or illegal imagery.

Safety, harassment, privacy, inaccurate origin or credit, rights and audience-label concerns should be reportable without composing a legal claim. A copyright notice has separate statutory requirements.

02Review and an opportunity to respond

The proposed process records the case, assesses urgency, preserves necessary evidence, and decides whether to restrict access, request a correction or leave content available. Where appropriate, the creator receives the relevant reason and an opportunity to respond. Absolute reporter anonymity cannot be promised where an investigation or legal process requires disclosure.

An ordinary appeal should identify the decision and story revision and explain the error, with relevant permission or context. Human reconsideration must be available before public launch. Staffing, response targets, escalation and a working appeal channel are not yet verified; this draft promises neither a fixed response time nor round-the-clock monitoring.

03Copyright notices and counter-notices

Before relying on a designated-agent process, the effective page must publish the verified agent’s name, mailing address, telephone and email matching the registration. No registration or safe-harbor eligibility is claimed here. A support inbox is not automatically a registered agent.

A notice generally identifies the protected work and material at issue, supplies locating information, contact details and a signature, and includes the required good-faith and accuracy/authority statements. See the U.S. Copyright Office’s notice-and-takedown resources; knowingly false claims can have legal consequences.

A statutory counter-notice is different from an ordinary appeal. It includes identification and former location of removed material, signature, a sworn mistake or misidentification statement, contact information and the required jurisdiction/service consent. It is shared with the complainant. The statutory restoration process generally uses a 10–14-business-day window after a compliant counter-notice unless the specified court-action notice is received. See 17 U.S.C. §512(g). Qualified counsel should approve the instructions and operation before activation.

The proposed service would terminate creator access in appropriate repeat-infringement cases using a documented assessment, not an invented automatic strike count. The operative policy and applicable technical-measure requirements need implementation and legal review.

04Removal is not the same as erasing every copy

Delisting, asset quarantine, stopping new downloads, removing an account and deleting a local file are different actions. Existing offline copies cannot be assumed recalled. The final process must explain their treatment and legally necessary retention without promising a remote erasure capability the app lacks.

Before public publishing opens: verify the contact, reporting and creator-blocking controls, case ownership, appeal workflow, rights process, age controls, account/cloud deletion and Apple account-token revocation. Posting these policies alone does not satisfy those requirements. Read the Content Rules, Creator Terms and Privacy Policy.